Stage Two: Inquiry Stalls Abortion Clinic

The article called "Inquiry Stalls Abortion Clinic," is about a battle between Pro-life and Pro-choice and whether clinic in Aurora, Illinois should be given an occupancy permit the Planned Parenthood of Chicago. The story tells that the Pro-Life Action League preventing the Planned Parenthood from letting them open the clinic, which allows abortion. A protest going on in Aurora that deals with an important national issue, abortion. The story tells about a battle going between Pro-life and Pro-choice.
The story involves the following organizations: Planned Parenthood, Pro-Life Action League, Alan Guttmacher Institute, and an Aurora spokesperson. The Planned Parenthood paid for the clinic in Aurora. The Pro-Life Action League is protested the clinic and has stalled Planned Parenthood from opening their clinic. The Alan Guttmacher Institute and the Aurora spokesperson are both neutral. The Alan Guttmacher Institute reported that Illinois 46th nationwide in access to contraceptive services. The Aurora spokesperson talked about whether Planned Parenthood had committed fraud by not revealing that they were to be the tenants of the building when the contractor first applied for the building permit.
When reading a news story it is important to ask the question: Is this an objective story? The article is an objective reporting of the story. The article is important because it deals with a major public debate: abortion the Pro-Life Action League is using local law, i.e. not revealing who the tenant will be when known. When applying for the building permit. The Planned Parenthood’s Argument, the reason the story is important is it show how Anti-Abortion organization are challenging abortion services at the local level. The numbers of how many organizations between the pro-life side and the pro-choice side are even. There is no winning side in the article "Inquiry Stalls Abortion Clinic."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/19/AR2007091902061.html

Auditors: Homeland Security not meeting expectations

The Article "Auditors: Homeland Security not meeting expectations," is about the Homeland Security Department not doing its jobs well enough to meet the expectations. The Homeland Security Department's primary goal is to keep additional terrorist attacks from happening and to keep the damages of a terrorist attack to a minimum. The Homeland Security Department has been trying to get on top of things since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But the Homeland Security Department has yet to meet those objectives since September 11, 2001.

The Homeland Security Department has made well developed plans and programs, but has not been able to fully complete and carry out those programs, because of the efforts to spot where people are illegally entering the United States, the report said. In congressional testimony Micheal Chertoff, the Homeland Security Secretary, defended the Homeland Security Department's progress and assured lawmakers the country was safer than it was before September 11, 2001. The experts and the Government Accounting Office auditors said that it would take the Homeland Security Department at least five years to seven years to come together and meet expectations. Government Accounting Office auditors also said that the Department of Defense that was started fifty years ago still faces serious management challenges.

People should read the article called "Auditors: Homeland Security not meeting expectations," the article is about the Homeland Security Department not meeting their required goals. The Homeland Security Department main expectation is to keep another terrorist attack from happening and if it does happen again the Homeland Security Department would try to keep the damage to the attack place to a minimum. The Homeland Security Department has been unable to meet those mandates for some time now.